Re: [Pharo-project] We need to do something, seriously!!!! [WAS] Fwd: Issue 1721: Refactoring appears to be broken in web dev image. e.g. OBClassNode(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #dynamicProtocols
May be you can contact david probably on holidays to see how we can make progress? I know that we can publish in david repository so may be a lot of the problems are simple glicth. Having a configuration for O2 would be good.
What I am not sure, David, can you confirm this ? is if what we talk in our private email a about the O2-Refactory (the problem we still have) is the same problem we are talking here. Because, in my opinion, one thing is just to depend and another thing is to depend and override. If there are overrides, it matters the order and a lot more stuff. That's why I am asking you :)
Is it the same? I hope so :)
I do not know, I cannot reproduce this bug (1721) in pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2. You say in the bug report you can reproduce it neither? So what is the problem you get and how can I reproduce it? I see in the attached stack trace from the creator of 1721 that his bug has something to do with dynamic protocols, but I cannot see the cause from the strack trace. I need to know which Pharo version, which browser version and which packages are loaded to reproduce and locate the problem. It might or might not be related to the problem we discussed, I can't tell yet. Cheers, David
David Röthlisberger-2 wrote:
May be you can contact david probably on holidays to see how we can make progress? I know that we can publish in david repository so may be a lot of the problems are simple glicth. Having a configuration for O2 would be good.
What I am not sure, David, can you confirm this ? is if what we talk in our private email a about the O2-Refactory (the problem we still have) is the same problem we are talking here. Because, in my opinion, one thing is just to depend and another thing is to depend and override. If there are overrides, it matters the order and a lot more stuff. That's why I am asking you :)
Is it the same? I hope so :)
I do not know, I cannot reproduce this bug (1721) in pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2. You say in the bug report you can reproduce it neither? So what is the problem you get and how can I reproduce it? I see in the attached stack trace from the creator of 1721 that his bug has something to do with dynamic protocols, but I cannot see the cause from the strack trace.
I need to know which Pharo version, which browser version and which packages are loaded to reproduce and locate the problem. It might or might not be related to the problem we discussed, I can't tell yet.
Cheers, David
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
To reproduce: Screenshots http://www.flickr.com/photos/8185994@N03/sets/72157623107648594/ pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2 Left click world, class browser - (menu about shows OBSystemBrowser) Left click AST-Core-Matching Left click RBParseTreeRule Middle click RBParseTreeRule menu slide to refactoring scope menu slide to package Brings up browser - (menu about shows OR2PackageBrowser) Left click AST-Core-Matching Left click RBParseTreeRule - walkback Same with all packages/classes tried Cheers, ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/We-need-to-do-something-seriously-WAS-Fwd-Issue-1721-Re... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thanks Stan! Great report On Dec 31, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Stan Shepherd wrote:
David Röthlisberger-2 wrote:
May be you can contact david probably on holidays to see how we can make progress? I know that we can publish in david repository so may be a lot of the problems are simple glicth. Having a configuration for O2 would be good.
What I am not sure, David, can you confirm this ? is if what we talk in our private email a about the O2-Refactory (the problem we still have) is the same problem we are talking here. Because, in my opinion, one thing is just to depend and another thing is to depend and override. If there are overrides, it matters the order and a lot more stuff. That's why I am asking you :)
Is it the same? I hope so :)
I do not know, I cannot reproduce this bug (1721) in pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2. You say in the bug report you can reproduce it neither? So what is the problem you get and how can I reproduce it? I see in the attached stack trace from the creator of 1721 that his bug has something to do with dynamic protocols, but I cannot see the cause from the strack trace.
I need to know which Pharo version, which browser version and which packages are loaded to reproduce and locate the problem. It might or might not be related to the problem we discussed, I can't tell yet.
Cheers, David
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
To reproduce: Screenshots http://www.flickr.com/photos/8185994@N03/sets/72157623107648594/
pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2 Left click world, class browser - (menu about shows OBSystemBrowser) Left click AST-Core-Matching Left click RBParseTreeRule Middle click RBParseTreeRule menu slide to refactoring scope menu slide to package Brings up browser - (menu about shows OR2PackageBrowser) Left click AST-Core-Matching Left click RBParseTreeRule - walkback
Same with all packages/classes tried
Cheers, ...Stan
-- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/We-need-to-do-something-seriously-WAS-Fwd-Issue-1721-Re... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:07 PM, David Röthlisberger <squeak@webcitas.ch>wrote:
May be you can contact david probably on holidays to see how we can make progress? I know that we can publish in david repository so may be a lot of the problems are simple glicth. Having a configuration for O2 would be good.
What I am not sure, David, can you confirm this ? is if what we talk in our private email a about the O2-Refactory (the problem we still have) is the same problem we are talking here. Because, in my opinion, one thing is just to depend and another thing is to depend and override. If there are overrides, it matters the order and a lot more stuff. That's why I am asking you :)
Is it the same? I hope so :)
I do not know, I cannot reproduce this bug (1721) in pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2. You say in the bug report you can reproduce it neither? So what is the problem you get and how can I reproduce it?
Here are the instructions to reproduce it: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1721 (Thanks sten!)
I see in the attached stack trace from the creator of 1721 that his bug has something to do with dynamic protocols, but I cannot see the cause from the strack trace.
Yes, it is something with that, but I am not sure.
I need to know which Pharo version, which browser version and which packages are loaded to reproduce and locate the problem. It might or might not be related to the problem we discussed, I can't tell yet.
Ok, no problem.
Cheers, David
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:07 PM, David Röthlisberger <squeak@webcitas.ch>wrote:
I need to know which Pharo version, which browser version and which packages are loaded to reproduce and locate the problem. It might or might not be related to the problem we discussed, I can't tell yet.
Ok, no problem.
Cheers, David
Hi David, are you saying that you need more info from me? My report was on a pharo1.0-10502-rc1web09.12.2 freshly downloaded. ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/We-need-to-do-something-seriously-WAS-Fwd-Issue-1721-Re... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (4)
-
David Röthlisberger -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Stan Shepherd -
Stéphane Ducasse