Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo based "Web Velocity"
Geert, I will say that there is definite interest on our part to port Moose/Glamour to GemStone. Cross platform tools are very interesting, because they provide a smooth transition into GemStone, when the need for GemStone arises. Dale ----- "Geert Claes" <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com> wrote: | Stéphane Ducasse wrote: | > | >> Just wondering if anyone here knows about Cincom's WebVelocity | Seaside | >> based | >> web development environment. | > | > Yes we got brain-washed :) | > | >> Are there any open source Pharo alternatives? | > | > May be Seaside-XUL or Glamour-Seaside. since Glamour browser can be | > displayed in a web browser. | > I imagine that in the future we may have just seaside loaded and | program | > in a web browser if we want. | > | > | | Yep, I am very interested into a smalltalk web app IDE for a while | now. | Although I really do like the concept behind WebVelocity, I have to | say that | I am not too keen on the tool as it is now. | | I also just started looking at Moose/Glamour after stumbling on it | recently. | In such an IDE, the project and component sharing is instrumental as | it will | boost innovation. Maybe Gemstone will come up with a Pharo based | alternative :) | -- | View this message in context: | http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-based-Web-Velocity-tp4240702p4241843.html | Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hi Dale, is there any interest in the SeasideXUL port into Gemstone too? The client software is Mozilla Firefox 3 or XULRunner so supported platforms should be Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD, Solaris and OpenSolaris. Cheers, -- Pavel On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemstone.com> wrote:
Geert,
I will say that there is definite interest on our part to port Moose/Glamour to GemStone. Cross platform tools are very interesting, because they provide a smooth transition into GemStone, when the need for GemStone arises.
Dale ----- "Geert Claes" <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com> wrote:
| Stéphane Ducasse wrote: | > | >> Just wondering if anyone here knows about Cincom's WebVelocity | Seaside | >> based | >> web development environment. | > | > Yes we got brain-washed :) | > | >>  Are there any open source Pharo alternatives? | > | > May be Seaside-XUL or Glamour-Seaside. since Glamour browser can be | > displayed in a web browser. | > I imagine that in the future we may have just seaside loaded and | program | > in a web browser if we want. | > | > | | Yep, I am very interested into a smalltalk web app IDE for a while | now. | Although I really do like the concept behind WebVelocity, I have to | say that | I am not too keen on the tool as it is now. | | I also just started looking at Moose/Glamour after stumbling on it | recently. | In such an IDE, the project and component sharing is instrumental as | it will | boost innovation.  Maybe Gemstone will come up with a Pharo based | alternative :) | -- | View this message in context: | http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-based-Web-Velocity-tp4240702p4241843.html | Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Pavel, Yes! With Metacello taking less of my time, I will again be splitting my time between scaling work with Seaside 3.0/2.8 and improving the tool set, so I'm hopeful that I will make progress on my todo list instead of watching the top climb out of sight:) Dale ----- "Pavel Krivanek" <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote: | Hi Dale, | | is there any interest in the SeasideXUL port into Gemstone too? The | client software is Mozilla Firefox 3 or XULRunner so supported | platforms should be Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD, Solaris and | OpenSolaris. | | Cheers, | -- Pavel | | On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Dale Henrichs | <dale.henrichs@gemstone.com> wrote: | > Geert, | > | > I will say that there is definite interest on our part to port | Moose/Glamour to GemStone. Cross platform tools are very interesting, | because they provide a smooth transition into GemStone, when the need | for GemStone arises. | > | > Dale | > ----- "Geert Claes" <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com> wrote: | > | > | Stéphane Ducasse wrote: | > | > | > | >> Just wondering if anyone here knows about Cincom's WebVelocity | > | Seaside | > | >> based | > | >> web development environment. | > | > | > | > Yes we got brain-washed :) | > | > | > | >>  Are there any open source Pharo alternatives? | > | > | > | > May be Seaside-XUL or Glamour-Seaside. since Glamour browser can | be | > | > displayed in a web browser. | > | > I imagine that in the future we may have just seaside loaded | and | > | program | > | > in a web browser if we want. | > | > | > | > | > | | > | Yep, I am very interested into a smalltalk web app IDE for a | while | > | now. | > | Although I really do like the concept behind WebVelocity, I have | to | > | say that | > | I am not too keen on the tool as it is now. | > | | > | I also just started looking at Moose/Glamour after stumbling on | it | > | recently. | > | In such an IDE, the project and component sharing is instrumental | as | > | it will | > | boost innovation.  Maybe Gemstone will come up with a Pharo based | > | alternative :) | > | -- | > | View this message in context: | > | | http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-based-Web-Velocity-tp4240702p4241843.html | > | Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. | > | | > | _______________________________________________ | > | Pharo-project mailing list | > | Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | > | | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | > | > _______________________________________________ | > Pharo-project mailing list | > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Dale Henrichs wrote:
Pavel,
Yes! With Metacello taking less of my time, I will again be splitting my time between scaling work with Seaside 3.0/2.8 and improving the tool set, so I'm hopeful that I will make progress on my todo list instead of watching the top climb out of sight:)
Dale
Sounds great Dale! -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-based-Web-Velocity-tp4240702p4243553.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (3)
-
Dale Henrichs -
Geert Claes -
Pavel Krivanek