Scale in 3.0 (kind of ANN)
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 Details on how to use here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale Enjoy, Phil
Nice but I would like to know the exact status of Coral because it would be bad to restart from scratch. #Luc 2014-12-02 8:38 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0
Details on how to use here:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale
Enjoy, Phil
Looks like dead and superseded by the .st handler. But this is not coral with classdefs etc. Phil Le 2 déc. 2014 09:49, "Luc Fabresse" <luc.fabresse@gmail.com> a écrit :
Nice but I would like to know the exact status of Coral because it would be bad to restart from scratch.
#Luc
2014-12-02 8:38 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0
Details on how to use here:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale
Enjoy, Phil
Indeed and we should build on top of Scale (adding coral syntax). Just no time for doing it. Tx phil to port Scale and publish it. In fact the commandline handler came for Camillo as a first step for Coral. Le 2/12/14 10:36, phil@highoctane.be a écrit :
Looks like dead and superseded by the .st handler.
But this is not coral with classdefs etc.
Phil
Le 2 déc. 2014 09:49, "Luc Fabresse" <luc.fabresse@gmail.com <mailto:luc.fabresse@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Nice but I would like to know the exact status of Coral because it would be bad to restart from scratch.
#Luc
2014-12-02 8:38 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> <phil@highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be>>:
I've put Guille's Scale thing (http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0
Details on how to use here:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale <http://smalltalkhub.com/#%21/%7Ephilippeback/Scale>
Enjoy, Phil
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Indeed and we should build on top of Scale (adding coral syntax). Just no time for doing it. Tx phil to port Scale and publish it.
Being forced to deploy and deal with Pharo on X-less servers makes me motivated. :-p Phil
In fact the commandline handler came for Camillo as a first step for Coral.
Le 2/12/14 10:36, phil@highoctane.be a écrit :
Looks like dead and superseded by the .st handler.
But this is not coral with classdefs etc.
Phil Le 2 déc. 2014 09:49, "Luc Fabresse" <luc.fabresse@gmail.com> a écrit :
Nice but I would like to know the exact status of Coral because it would be bad to restart from scratch.
#Luc
2014-12-02 8:38 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0
Details on how to use here:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale
Enjoy, Phil
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J6-3l3hCm0 On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:19 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Indeed and we should build on top of Scale (adding coral syntax). Just no time for doing it. Tx phil to port Scale and publish it. In fact the commandline handler came for Camillo as a first step for Coral.
Le 2/12/14 10:36, phil@highoctane.be a écrit :
Looks like dead and superseded by the .st handler.
But this is not coral with classdefs etc.
Phil Le 2 déc. 2014 09:49, "Luc Fabresse" <luc.fabresse@gmail.com> a écrit :
Nice but I would like to know the exact status of Coral because it would be bad to restart from scratch.
#Luc
2014-12-02 8:38 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0
Details on how to use here:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale
Enjoy, Phil
mixed the posts again :D I wanted to say great work I definitely want to use Pharo in the terminal.
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
I've put Guille's Scale thing (http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0
Details on how to use here:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale
Enjoy, Phil
We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, it sounded nice.
Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :) For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com>:
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
I've put Guille's Scale thing (http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 Details on how to use here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale Enjoy, Phil
We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, it sounded nice.
Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :)
For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
+1 Norbert
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com>:
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 Details on how to use here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale Enjoy, Phil
We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, it sounded nice.
Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :)
For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
+1
Scale is what it was. There is also Coral, so, well, marine names are staying. If we want a 'sh', what about: phish phash phosh psh is not too bad after all. pharosh looks cool too. With "phish" we can say, "I am phishing" in the same vein as "I am bashing". Phil
Norbert
all shells are not named *sh for example, I really would love to have Xiki (http://xiki.org/screencasts/) in Pharo ;-) #Luc 2014-12-02 14:17 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com>:
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 Details on how to use here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale Enjoy, Phil
We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, it sounded nice.
Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :)
For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
+1
Scale is what it was. There is also Coral, so, well, marine names are staying.
If we want a 'sh', what about:
phish phash phosh
psh is not too bad after all. pharosh looks cool too.
With "phish" we can say, "I am phishing" in the same vein as "I am bashing".
Phil
Norbert
wow. is amazing. 2014-12-02 14:46 GMT+01:00 Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse@gmail.com>:
all shells are not named *sh for example, I really would love to have Xiki ( http://xiki.org/screencasts/) in Pharo ;-)
#Luc
2014-12-02 14:17 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com>:
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 Details on how to use here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale Enjoy, Phil
We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, it sounded nice.
Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :)
For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
+1
Scale is what it was. There is also Coral, so, well, marine names are staying.
If we want a 'sh', what about:
phish phash phosh
psh is not too bad after all. pharosh looks cool too.
With "phish" we can say, "I am phishing" in the same vein as "I am bashing".
Phil
Norbert
yes I know I will try to put a student on it but I must get a good one ;-) #Luc 2014-12-02 14:53 GMT+01:00 Santiago Bragagnolo <santiagobragagnolo@gmail.com
:
wow. is amazing.
2014-12-02 14:46 GMT+01:00 Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse@gmail.com>:
all shells are not named *sh for example, I really would love to have Xiki ( http://xiki.org/screencasts/) in Pharo ;-)
#Luc
2014-12-02 14:17 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com>:
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
I've put Guille's Scale thing ( http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 Details on how to use here: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale Enjoy, Phil
We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, it sounded nice.
Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :)
For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
+1
Scale is what it was. There is also Coral, so, well, marine names are staying.
If we want a 'sh', what about:
phish phash phosh
psh is not too bad after all. pharosh looks cool too.
With "phish" we can say, "I am phishing" in the same vein as "I am bashing".
Phil
Norbert
phil@highoctane.be wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name <mailto:norbert@hartl.name>> wrote:
> Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com <mailto:btc@openinworld.com>>: > > phil@highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> wrote: >> I've put Guille's Scale thing (http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/) into Pharo 3.0 >> Details on how to use here: >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale >> Enjoy, >> Phil > > > > We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells, > > it sounded nice. > > Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :) > > For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh, bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh? > +1
Scale is what it was. There is also Coral, so, well, marine names are staying.
okay.
If we want a 'sh', what about:
phish phash phosh
psh is not too bad after all.
Unfortunately taken by perl. http://gnp.github.io/psh/
pharosh looks cool too.
With "phish" we can say, "I am phishing" in the same vein as "I am bashing".
phishing has negative connotations wrt IT security scams
Phil
Norbert
participants (7)
-
Ben Coman -
kilon alios -
Luc Fabresse -
Norbert Hartl -
phil＠highoctane.be -
Santiago Bragagnolo -
stepharo