Re: [Pharo-project] [1.4] Doing a #condenseChanges in #14158
On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
On 20.09.2011 15:26, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Performant method history browsing from Monticello repositories is never going to be a reality. I'd gladly give 100 ⬠(or a beer, whichever is preferred) to someone who can prove me wrong :) It is reality since 3+ years in Monticello 2.
Lukas
Monticello 2 != Monticello, sadly
But if it works since 3 years, why don't we use it and retire Monticello 1? Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
On 20.09.2011 15:39, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
On 20.09.2011 15:26, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Performant method history browsing from Monticello repositories is never going to be a reality. I'd gladly give 100 ⬠(or a beer, whichever is preferred) to someone who can prove me wrong :) It is reality since 3+ years in Monticello 2.
Lukas
Monticello 2 != Monticello, sadly
But if it works since 3 years, why don't we use it and retire Monticello 1?
Marcus
Effort? I wouldn't mind switching as soon as someone: - Rewrites the update process - Writes a translator for MC1 -> MC2 repositories - Figures out how/if we support loading code from/to MC1/MC2 without users getting confused - Makes sure the tools are at least as good, and don't rely on frameworks not in Core There's sure to be more things which needs doing, some of the ones listed above may already have been done? I know next to nothing about MC2 other than it being a complete rewrite with incompatible format and better granularity... Cheers, Henry
participants (2)
-
Henrik Sperre Johansen -
Marcus Denker