ok ok, I surrender :) On 2010-05-15 07:22:51 -0300, Michael Roberts <mike@mjr104.co.uk> said:
You might disagree but it's what we decided. We should keep different version tags so that we can use different update streams (sections within) in the future.
Cheers mike
On Friday, May 14, 2010, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wro te:
I do not have strong feeling about that ;) Just busy :)
On May 14, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
May I disagree with that? I mean "pharo" is "pharo core", and "pharo dev " is just pharo+packages loaded, so I don't see the point on declaring it a different version.
On 2010-05-14 09:04:31 -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.c om> said:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Why SystemVersion current version answers 'PharoCore1.0' and not just 'Pharo1.0'? Maybe to distinguish from PharoDev? PharoCore answers -> Â 'PharoCore1.0' PharoDev (a.k.a Pharo) answers -> Â 'Pharo-1.0' Cheers, Esteban _______________________________________________ Pharo-project