Hi, Yes, indeed. I think it is already much better than it was some months ago, and I definitely think it is a great goal to have everything around RB. My question was only if there is anyone that invests in this actively because perhaps we can work together? Cheers, Doru On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
Hello,
Yes, I am aware of that.
The idea was to evaluate how good the RB AST colouring is already and maybe find the energy to fix all remaining problems⦠we fixed many but not all.
I propose that we keep it for some month more and if we donât improve these problems go back to the old scheme for Pharo5.
Then we can re-start to work on this in Pharo6.
Marcus
On 05 Sep 2015, at 07:28, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Here is an example.
Type this in a playground in a Pharo 5 image, and all statements before the parentheses become black: | a b c d | a := 42. b := a + 1. c := b + 1. d := c + 1. a . b . c . d }
<Playground-50.png>
Here is how this looks in a Pharo 4:
<Playground-40.png>
Cheers, Doru
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de> wrote:
This depends on the kind of error. For example, a missing open or closed parenthesis will most likely mark the whole (following) code.
But it should still highlight the preceding code. Can you give an example.
nicolai
2015-09-04 23:10 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>:
Hi,
I think it's nice that we are going towards consolidating our tools around RB.
However, the highlighting logic is not quite enough because if I have an error anywhere in the code, the whole highlighting disappears. In contrast, Shout manages to limit the problem only to the surrounding code.
Is anyone working on this part of the highlighting?
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"