Having a package name without any - will prevent Monticello from being confuse on some point. Stef and I already experienced that... I was never happy in inserting a - in a package name. Alexandre On 11 Sep 2008, at 07:23, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi
I noticed that we have CollectionsTests-Ordered kind of package name and I would prefer to get Collections-Ordered- Tests What do you think. I bit of regularity would help.
Collections-Test-* categories belong to the Collections-Test package on monticello. If you rename it to Collections-Ordered-Tests, you will put everything in the Collections package (because there is no Collections-Ordered monticello package).
-- Damien Cassou Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.