Note that when:send:to: already existed in VW before announcements (it did work with a symbol like when: #someAspectChanged send: #someAction to: self, and this was tiggered thru dependents mechanism - self changed: #someAspectChanged...). IMO, it is very expressive, whatever the underlying mechanism (dependents or Announcement). 2015-09-09 8:49 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name>:
Am 08.09.2015 um 22:49 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
Me too :) I do not care that they is a registration mechanism behind.
But you get a subscription back. Und the user should be aware of that there is no magical unsubscribe mechanism. So this no reason for me but I still like when:send:to: better although it feels a bit awkward.
Norbert
Stef
Le 8/9/15 16:30, Ferlicot D. Cyril a écrit :
Le 08/09/2015 10:13, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
When looking at the implementation, it looks as if we should replace all #when:send:to: by #subscribe:when:do:, not the other way around.
Where is this all coming from?
Stephan I think that #when:send:to: is more explicit and more understandable, but this is a personal opinion.