On 14 Nov 2016, at 17:18, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14/11/2016 15:50, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
2016-11-14 15:37 GMT+01:00 Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com <mailto:emaringolo@gmail.com>>:
Breaking Metacello in any version = Not good.
Metacello is very backward compatible but breaking pragma semantics would require a rewrite of many configurations that work okay today
Why? ConfigurationOf~ not collect any pragmas by themselves. They only declare versions by pragmas. And we only need to fix Pharo version of Metacello which is already fork.
Changes to Metacello should be done on metacello-work repository and not only on Pharo. Else we will not be able to load the latest Metacello anymore and we will not have the latest cool features of Dale.
Yes. The change has to be reverted and then later we need to see what to do in a way that is less disruptive. After we decided to freeze is for sure the wrong time for a change like this. Marcus