mariano cleanUp: true support agrresive cleanup = "shrink" On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote: What I do on my build server is to unload the tests:
(MCWorkingCopy allManagers inject: Gofer new into: [ :gofer :each | ((each packageName endsWith: 'Test') or: [ each packageName endsWith: 'Tests' ]) ifTrue: [ gofer package: each packageName ]. gofer ]) unload.
ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForProduction do that but similary:
#(#Tests #CollectionsTests #CompilerTests #FreeTypeTests #GraphicsTests #KernelTests #MorphicTests #MultilingualTests #NetworkTests #ToolsTest) do: [ :each | (MCPackage named: each) unload ]. "unload SUnit" Smalltalk globals at: #TestCase ifPresent: [ :class | SystemChangeNotifier uniqueInstance noMoreNotificationsFor: class ]. #(#SUnitGUI #SUnit) do: [ :each | (MCPackage named: each) unload ].
Maybe we you should change it ?
Hi folks. I was playing a bit trying to shrink a little a PharoCore image. My idea was to think a shrink that was be acceptable for the most common scenario: a runtime (production) environment where. Of course, some of the things I do in the shrinks has side effects, but most of the times, you can deal with that in such scenarios.
Shouldn't most of the code you publish be part of the <cleanup> protocol?
You refere to the "new" cleanUp protocol ?
The thing is that not everything is a cleanUp, but a shrink. Suppose the code that zap all the organizations...that's not a cleanUp. So, maybe yes, but not all of them.
Cheers
Mariano
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project