Iâm happy to get feedback. Just wanted to know that I care about the issues :)
On 07 Sep 2015, at 22:07, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
I'm not complaining. I know that there is a good chance that we break the system when improving it. I have no problem with that and I prefer a living system with some bugs for a while than a dead system with no bug :) I'm just trying to help handling this problem. This is alpha with all the risks. Stef
Le 7/9/15 00:46, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
I think that it is related to how I was working with Nautilus announcements. Now as announcements are changed, I can improve that. Just give me a bit of time :)
Uko
On 06 Sep 2015, at 22:17, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
I thought that I could reproduce the QA concurrent access raising a DNU when we remove a method but I failed. I got again this bug. What I did was selecting a method in Nautilus and removing this method after an implementors and from the message list browser. But I cannot reproduce it.
Stef