Right now SystemOrganization is a global stored in SystemDictionary. And it would be nice to have a new instance named organizer held by SystemDictionary that points to the organizer associated with the SystemDictionary. Similarly it would be good not to point to the global but use this new methods. I imagine that it requires some care. Now if you have a class comments please send it we will integrate it: add it to the bug tracker. I'm a bit worry to introduce a "singleton" Stef
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Now can we do it better :) what I would love it if we can have SystemOrganization be an instance variable of the SystemDictionary and may be returned by the categorizer message sent to Smalltalk globals. This way each instance of SystemDictionary would have its own SystemOrganizer instance.
Sounds good. I might be able to do that if I had more detail.
Also, until that refactoring is done, it would be helpful to make SystemOrganizer easier to use - if not the method, maybe at least the class comment?
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
This will make sure that people can experiment with alternate semantics and that we do not have one monolitic system :)
Sounds interesting (even though I'm not sure exactly what that means, lol). Maybe I'll do a little digging here...
Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Feature-SystemOrganizer-class-default-returns-SystemOr... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project