On May 3, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
Why not to have both :-)
yes, we should do that.
-- Pavel
3.5.2012 v 5:05, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>:
When you download a lot of images every week, this is nice to have a build number in order to recognize them. Regards,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Francisco Garau <francisco.garau@gmail.com> wrote:
How about Jenkins putting a build suffix to the images? -- something like Pharo-2.0.build-20040.image
At the moment, all the build generate files with the same name.
https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0/41/
2.0 #20040
Pharo-2.0.changes 13069724 Pharo-2.0.image 18732936 Pharo-2.0-one-click.zip 19242637 Pharo-2.0.zip 14962904
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de