Feb. 20, 2014
2:29 p.m.
On 2014-02-20, at 15:18, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:32, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
This test is really fragile... If you look at the code you'll see that it has already been patched to cope with some defects under linux.
- Maybe one try is to increase the wait time? - make sure the fork happens at higher priority than the surrounding thread - skip it :P
Someone should make a choiceâ¦
I vote for skipping it for now
Fine with me: skip + issue tracker entry