July 17, 2013
8:39 p.m.
On 2013-07-17, at 22:32, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
So you would be ready to change notNil -> isNotNil and become a bit more incompatible with the rest of the world?
that method is already present in the image.
I understand that the pair isEmpty/isNotEmpty may seem a bit more homogeneous, but I see no other selector constructed with (isNot isnt) while I see many others where is is omitted. I wonder what this kind of change really serve...
For me they are consistent with all the other is* methods out there returning booleans.