April 17, 2013
9:10 a.m.
On 2013-04-17, at 02:50, "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Camillo Bruni-3 wrote
I liked ruby-gems approach more than the one in Metacello. You usually specify a major version (as under linux) for your dependency.
It seems they're using semantic versioning, which is *awesome*, but can we depend on the convention being followed? I've been pushing to get the tools (e.g. Versionner) to use semantic version numbers by default (i.e. new bugfix version, new enhancement version, new incompatible version)
Yeah I think we can run all of that on top of versioner/conventions. You can always introduce symbolic versions for releases as well so the old habit of directly referring to a fixed version number will still continue to work.