On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
As Markus said it is good idea to add #argumentNames to block.
What exactly you want to see at TxText? I ask because Igor make big progress on his design implementation which I think will replace my work totally. So if you want to join his development you don't need my code at all (remove it)
Not totally from what I saw and monday all the tests were green and we published the code because it was the end of a large refactoring to get immutable objects into place and having tests were cool. When we start a new behavior like copyText we started with tests. Stef
But my version (which is at configuration) is usable and works nice for end user applications. I actually use it for my tasks.
2013/10/11 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> I recently checked the progress on TxText and I saw that half of the tests fail under 3.0 due to an incompatibility in Mocketry on BlockClosure>>#argumentNames trying to decompile the block contents. This feature is no longer available, instead you have to access the AST directly:
BlockClosure >> #argumentNames ^ self sourceNode arguments collect: [ :each | each name ]
Would it be possible to integrate that on a 3.0 branch? It's quite a pity to waste so many tests :)