Hi Doru: On 08 Mar 2013, at 06:54, Tudor Girba wrote:
The #development version of ConfigurationOfPhexample points to a hardcoded version. Phexample is used extensively in Fame, and Fame is a Moose project, and we have the convention that the Moose projects should have the #development version point to a baseline.
Please add me to the project so that I can fix the configuration.
I added you. But, please, before you fix the configuration, have a look at Stef's solution to the #includesSubString: vs. #includesSubstring: issue between Pharo 1.4 and Pharo 2.0. His solution is to use Phexample-StefanMarr.67 as Pharo 2.0 implementation and Phexample-StephaneDucasse.68 as Pharo 1.4 version. See [1]. I don't think this is maintainable, but did not yet get around to do it properly. Thanks Stefan [1] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Phexample/Phexample/diff/Phexample-StephaneDucas... -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525