1) First of all, I don't like the PharoWeb name. Because it is not Web in general, it is seaside. So, in my opinion, a better name would be PharoSeaside. Maybe even new comers may think that the only alternative is seaside. You know I have nothing against Seaside and that I even use it several times. I would like to see AidaWeb images based in Pharo too.
I think at some point the images also contained AIDA.
4) Now I created all the Metacello configurations for the PharoDev image and I took me a lot of time. Because I am not the developer of any of those projects. So, I need to understand the dependencies, the order, the versions, etc. But why ??? If Seaside people have already done that, don't duplicate efforts.
There is a configuration for Seaside 3.0 (and probably also Seaside 2.8). This was probably the first configuration every written. Ask Dale.
4) You may notice that Seaside images are a bit "different" than our Dev images. This is mostly due to the preferences, the theme and maybe some tools (ECompeltion instead of OCompletion, etc..). So, what I suggest is to prepare a little script that can be downloadable and those people who want a Seaside image but more "similar" to our Dev images, just run that script.
They are different because they reflect my preferences. I basically build the Seaside images for me. If other people like and use these images, that's great of course. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch