Indeed, refactorings for unit tests are completely absent from the software engineering community. Alexandre On 19 Aug 2011, at 15:39, laurent laffont wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote: Before leading a revolution, we can maybe have this work for unit test first :-)
Actually, when I think about it, having not the setUp visible when writing tests make the setUp functionality mostly useless.
Also, I usually write the setUp to remove duplication, so often after the second test method. A refactoring "extract to setUp" would be cool too.
Another point, when I have a hierarchy of TestCase I often feel I need a "merged setUp view"
Laurent.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 19 Aug 2011, at 15:19, laurent laffont wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote: Hi!
I know there are many TDD shoguns around.
I was wondering whether I am the only one suffering from the need to see the definition of setUp before writing a test method. Unfortunately, current tool does not automatically show the definition of setUp when I want to write a new test. The cost of seeing how the setUp is done is high: need to open a new window, clicking to restore the context on the first window, ...
Am I the only one?
No. I would like too.
But not only for tests. I often need to look at several related methods at once while developing.
Laurent.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.