On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 г. at 16:11, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dennis Schetinin <chaetal@gmail.com (mailto:chaetal@gmail.com)> wrote:
Am I wrong considering migration to Git-or-AnythingElseTextOriented to be a give up on hopes for a real object-oriented source control/management as it could and should be in Smalltalk?
can you think of any feature we could have now we couldn't with Git? I didn't say "now", I talked about "hopes". E.g. hopes for "Source" Control Tool being aware of refactorings and other *operations* I apply to my program, instead of treating it as a plain text with some changes of unknown nature. I'm not sure it's possible right now (I know it's not, better to say?). But with a Smalltalk-based source control we can have it on one splendid day in the future. And I think on the Git way we'll finish with just some advanced text-comparison algorithms. No?
Best regards, Dennis Schetinin Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)