Aug. 16, 2011
1:35 p.m.
On 16 August 2011 14:33, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
frank wrote:
Meaning that anything ripped out of Sophie 1.0 should be (or is, rather) >covered by an MIT licence, rather than Sophie 2.0's licence. Which is a good >thing!
Sophie 2.0 is ECL: Â http://www.sophie2.org/users/licensing.html Sophie 1.0 is BSD: Â http://www.futureofthebook.org/sophie/about/license
Where did you read about MIT?`
BSD, MIT. They're pretty much identical. Anyway, I should have said "BSD". frank
Bye T. -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone