On Sep 10, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Udo Schneider <udo.schneider@homeaddress.de> wrote:
On 10/09/16 10:52, stepharo wrote: So this is what I was trying to get done. I do not know if what you propose (which can be better than what I was planning) requires to change fileSystem, my goal was not to change for now but just make sure that I can get cheaply file to print themselves into kind of objects I can manipulate again.
Now if what you propose is better, then first we should introduce a logic to handle :file :memory
And I'm not against so plese push it but this is outside of my little goal for now. You're right. Your solution is much simpler - therefore I'd go with your solution for now.
would be nice. Push this idea. Once the community agrees then we can easily extend the printOn: behavior. I'll try to work through the FS code and see if I can get the stuff I'm thinking about implemented.
Did you watch the excellent talk of marcus at ESUG? Because I think incrementally One of the first videos/slidedecks I watched - the title made me curious. My key take-away is that it's better to implement the cheap/simple/non-perfect enhancement now than never (too late) the perfect one.
"Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."