April 26, 2012
10:21 p.m.
On 26 April 2012 23:05, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Why holding 35 parsers in memory is a problem?
I imagine that the trees should be much much larger.
It's not really a problem. I just think it's less elegant than keeping the parsers around only during a parse. frank
Stef