March 6, 2012
6:30 p.m.
This may be a stupid question⦠(As far as I understand, condensing the changes is not the same) Why don't you increment the version number of the sources file to 1.1 and use a fresh changes file? Max On 06.03.2012, at 18:42, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 06.03.2012 09:44, Marcus Denker wrote:
... what do we do?
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 (but that will not help that much. And someone would need to look at the tracker entry and make it ready for integration).
or just do a condense? The history is in Monticello.
Do people actually really rely on the .changes or just say they do? I'd be fine with just a condense.
Cheers Philippe