reasons - and:and:and: is only used in squeak totally not portable. (we could live with that) - and: is optimized by the compiler - and:and: are not optimized is it ok? Stef On May 26, 2010, at 10:10 AM, nullPointer wrote:
But I don´t understand why the methods #and:and:and: AND #and:and:and:and: must be deprecateds... what is the equivalence now for that messages? is possible create a #&& and #|| messages?
Regards -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/and-and-and-deprecated-on-1-1-why-tp2230786p2231198.ht... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project