Aug. 17, 2011
12:27 p.m.
On 17 August 2011 14:23, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
What you think?
How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and you didn't get a warning. You are you supposed to check for deprecated methods? Debug each and every one of your message sends?
+1, such an annotation is totally counterproductive.
Provide an alternative. Imagine that we're want to deprecate Array>>at: what is possible solution? Because we need to have some way to deal with deprecation things like that, not only stuff which used sparingly.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.