March 26, 2013
8:14 a.m.
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Camille Teruel <camille.teruel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 mars 2013, at 08:51, Camillo Bruni wrote:
On 2013-03-26, at 08:24, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:
why do we unload deprecated20 now
but it was deprecated in 2.0, so you keep it in 1 version => 2.0 and remove it in the next version => 3.0.
It totally agree. However we could have cleaned the senders of those deprecated first, because DNUs will appear eventually.
normally the person who deprecates a method should fix all senders. I was so sure that this is the case that I did not even check. Marcus