On 5 Nov 2016, at 12:27, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 05/11/2016 à 12:12, Jan van de Sandt a écrit :
Hi,
With the latest 64bits VM (201611042126) and image (60282) UFFI is also looking good. I'm testing a small library of mine [1] to interface with LMDB [1], a memory mapped key-value database. Almost all tests are green. This is great progress!
Hi Jan,
did you have to change your UFFI definitions to match the 64bits version of your lib?
no. but structures do change (because of sizes, of course). Iâm thinking a way to define a generic representation (keeping offsets somewhere instead hardcoding it), but for now they have to be redefined for each platform. Esteban
Thierry
I only ran into one issue, a PrimitiveFailed error with #basicIdentityHash in the SmallFloat64 class.
Cheers, Jan.
[1] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~JanVanDeSandt/LightningMDB [2] https://symas.com/products/lightning-memory-mapped-database/
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ <http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/> Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip>
this is still not official (thatâs why is not in official place) so there are a couple of known problems:
- version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that depends on it to know what happens - command line is different and probably youâll need to play a bit with options (one or two dashes). - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works).
I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems.
cheers, Esteban
On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm and image?
Thanks,
Thierry