Dale We are investing massively on metacello so now this is important for us to know if you will continue to maintain it or not. Because if this is not the case then we will have to rethink our strategy. Stef
Christophe,
I'm not exactly sure what your problem is ...
I have to admit that I haven't kept up with Pharo2.0 since last summer when I couldn't use Pharo2.0 for development because of OsProcess issues. I know that recently those issues have been cleared up, but I haven't had the time to return to Pharo2.0 and check things out (I'm facing more issues with getting PHaro2.0 to work with travis-ci, etc. so it will be a big undertaking for me to fully support Pharo2.0).
I've got a fairly recent Pharo2.0 image and it looks like there are pharo-specific versions for each of the packages loaded into Pharo2.0. I assume that the tests are all passing with those versions, although I can't say whether or not the tests had to be modified to pass in Pharo2.0 as well ... which is likely to be a source of one of the problems you are looking at ...
I don't know where the configuration exists that is being used to manage the changes for Pharo2.0 and the tests, but that is probably a good starting point ... if you are not using the proper Pharo2.0 configuration, you won't be getting the proper packages loaded ...
Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Christophe Demarey" <Christophe.Demarey@inria.fr> | To: metacello@googlegroups.com | Cc: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 6:09:27 AM | Subject: [Pharo-project] Metacello issues on Pharo 2.0 | | Hi all, | | I have issues with Metacello on Pharo 2.0 | | If I load and run tests for the version used in Pharo1.4, it gives: | (ConfigurationOfMetacello project version: '1.0-beta.31.1.4') load: 'Tests' | | | | Metacello packages shipped with Pharo 2.0 are all packages derived from the | latest stable Metacello baseline (1.0-beta.31.1.5) except the | MetacelloToolBox. | If I load and run tests packages with version described in the latest stable | Metacello baseline (1.0-beta.31.1.5), i.e. : | Metacello-TestsCore-DaleHenrichs.14 and | Metacello-TestsMC-dkh.351, | it gives (Pharo 2.0 #20547): | | | So, it seems there are some problems. Do we use the rigth versions of | Metacello packages? | | Regards, | Christophe. | | | Chr