about the whole community. Some told me they would stop using my dev-images if I use Sake/Packages without giving any good reason). I hope Keith won't give up.
One problem I see with Sake/Packages is that these tools depend on a lot of other packages, that I don't necessarily want to have loaded in my images: Logging, Rio, Installer, Sake, Packages ... I guess one could argue the same with XML and Universe.
You can define a package with non-specific versions, i.e. to load the latest seaside when keeping up with the bleeding edge.
This sounds very suspicious. That can't reliably work with standard Monticello, all projects I know use multiple branches at some point. I agree that Universes is not the ultimate solution, but at least it seems to work reasonably well. I like the declarative way to specifying package dependencies. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch