On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2015, at 18:46, David T. Lewis <lewis@mail.msen.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:21, David T. Lewis <lewis@mail.msen.com> wrote:
No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be an external package.
mmmââ¬Â¦ we want to include it as more and more people requires it and we can profit from having it in the image (same as FFI). why do you think it should be external?
We should distinguish between having it traditionally-in-Image where that is the only place it exists and fixes are integrated, and the current trend (e.g. in-Image Glamorous Tools) where fixes are integrated "upstream" into an external package
Yes, that is what I meant.
Dave
Several packages are in that situation: Zinc, STON, FUEL, ... it works quite well.
In fact, Fuel was integrated in the "traditionally-in-Image" style, but at some point we could switch to the new trend. MartÃn