good news. So I will do it. On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Fernando olivero wrote:
This method is used when installing an new editor on a TextMorph, and resusing the state of the previous one ( for example: selection interval).
Currently we are just creating a new one, so YES, we could remove all senders.
Fernando.
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
From: stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@gmail.com> Date: August 17, 2010 10:46:05 PM GMT+02:00 To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Subject: TextEditor>>possiblyChanged broke TextEditor quite well :(
Hi fernando
apparently in TextEditor>>stateArrayPut: stateArray there is call to possiblyChanged which does not exist in pharo or Squeak
TextEditor>>stateArrayPut: stateArray | sel | sel := stateArray at: 1. self selectFrom: sel first to: sel last. beginTypeInBlock := stateArray at: 2. emphasisHere := stateArray at: 3. morph possiblyChanged
And this breaks the system when I try to integrate the ParagraphEditro replacement.... lost laready a couple of hours
In CUIS it is defined as
PluggableTextMorph>>possiblyChanged "A hook for notificating possible interested parties Not used in base system"
TextMorph>>possiblyChanged
TextMorphForEditView>>possiblyChanged editView possiblyChanged
So? Do we need that? if not we should remove all the senders Stef
<ATT00001..txt>
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project