On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
slightly shorter it is the fork in the road:
are you committing to Pharo or Squeak?
I did not get that? commited :)? to pharo?
Well, yes :-) Basically meaning we need to maintain packages explicitly for Pharo.
Yes!
For MIME I would like to hear if seasider have an alternative to KOM: is swazoo an ok alternative?
The problem with MIME and Kom is that Kom changes quite a few things, which basically require to revert most of the MIME changes. The recursion with the mimeType method is one of them.
Arggh ok now I understand. Stef
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project