Le 23/7/15 23:49, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
HI,
yes, ban may make sense. I think that âfalse positiveâ is a bit incorrect. For example, consider the âprobably missing yourselfâ rule. Even if you are not missing it, the rule is not wrong. It just warns you that you should be carful with this case, because it is easy to screw up something. Now even while this is not a false positive, you want to skip the rule for this method.
That was the philosophy behind the name. I do not know. We discussed a lot in the past about this vocabulary and it would be good to have one. I do not understand the diff between this is useless and skip. I prefer ban this rule = do not run it false positive = rule is ok but wrong here
Stef
Uko
On 23 Jul 2015, at 22:29, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
HI yuriy
it would be good that quality assistant uses the same vocabulary than codecritics. for example skip -> ban? marks as false positif?
Stef