I was just thinking if this really makes sense or not...Suppose I have the PharoCore image 12121.
From that image, I can shrink it and generate PharoKernel 12121.
If I then have a configuration to load the core again, I will have again PharoCore 12121, which I already have, and which I can directly use. So...what is the sense of creating again PharoCore from PharoKernel?
A different story is if PharoCore 12121 DOES NOT exist before...so you start from PharoKernel 12121 and THEN create PharoCore....but PharoKernel is a shrink from PharoCore...soo...?
I am confused :(
cheers
mariano
So ...
listen little jedi - if we do not have an infrastructure in place to manage lot of packages then there is no need to push to get a little core. - I would be already really happy if I can take pharoKernel + MCloader -> loading metacello and loading all the packages and get 12121 - Now when we are in step 2 we will be able to - cut packages change the map and snap out fingers or think about the forces and produce better packaged system - iterate - I'm not a big believer of shrinking and I would like to have a bootstrap but this is the path to go. so ideally at the end of the process we should be able to even recreate bootstrappedpharoKernel from itself of another image. Stef