Feb. 27, 2014
6:21 p.m.
On 27 Feb 2014, at 16:23, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:
So after doing that, the actual implementation of the Parser can then be easily exchanged, the only thing it needs to do is to create a RB AST.
OK, so the idea is remove RBParser but keep all RBProgramNode classes?
If the Parser would be changed, then yes, that would be the idea. RBProgramNode + subclasses is an AST. This AST can be created by any kind of Parser, it is independent. Marcus