On 25 Aug 2017, at 15:50, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 25 Aug 2017, at 15:47, Henrik Sperre Johansen <henrik.s.johansen@veloxit.no> wrote:
Less crassly, what I meant to say, was; it'd be really nice if the integration process was fixed before too much energy is spent trying to backport/solve reported issues.
Yes, you are right⦠the strange thing is that the problem was introduced very late and we do not yet really understand what it isâ¦
(And I kind of suppressed my knowledge about it⦠just rememberd it when I tried to check a back port and it failed).
I added an issue tracker entry. The very odd thing is that this test does *not* fail when you run it, it does not fail when run as part of the image tests when doing an update, either. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20339/Pharo6-test-runs-for-CI-fail-with-st... <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20339/Pharo6-test-runs-for-CI-fail-with-st...> Marcus