Feb. 11, 2010
7:53 p.m.
hi all Jannik and jb started to replace all the and:and: and:and:and: and:and:and:and: and the same for or: by they equivalent ie 1 =2 or: [ 1=3 ] or: [1=1] => 1 =2 or: [ 1=3 or: [1=1]] the new compiler optimize both while the old one not. So now I would like to see what do you think. Personnally I do not like and:and:and: and more Now for and:and: I'm hesitating. Stef