May 20, 2011
9:32 a.m.
On 20.05.2011 11:14, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
please please please I want that!
I want to be able to do:
aSet add: 'mariano'; add: nil; add: 'guille'; add: nil.
aSet size -> 3
aSet contains: nil -> true
aSet remove: nil.
aSet contains: nil -> false It's not like I'm principaly against it, but... why? Other than treating all objects equally, I mean?
I honestly can't come up with a single case where I'd want to put nil in a Set on purpose. Cheers, Henry