why wasting an energy on something, which not gives any benefits? i completely agree that proper naming is important. but the framework was originally designed not by us, and i think its not quite correct to rename it without asking the author. On 6 October 2011 16:21, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
What the whole world call "event" we call "announcement". I understand the need for a new name back at the time where Smalltalk has its old event mechanism. But this does not hold anymore I feel.
I though about this renaming when working on Pharo by example 2. Having "Event" instead of "Announcement" in the index tells much more what the chapter is about.
Alexandre
On 6 Oct 2011, at 10:58, Fernando Olivero wrote:
I dont agree entirely with you Alex, nowadays we announce an announcement, instead of sending events. I mean, should we start announcing events? Fernando
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Hi!
What about moving our rebelness and energy into innovation rather than giving strange name? :-)
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.