Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo VMs should be more Pharo-like

On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Currently, we are linking official VMs  for pharo taking directly from Jenkins a version and packaging for download (or for Pharo One-Click). 
> I think this is a temporal solution, we need something better: 
> 
> 1) Pharo VMs should have Pharo Icons. 
+1

> 2) Pharo VMs should be named "pharo" or "pharovm" (better the fist), not "CogVM", which is an internal name.
+ 1

> 3) We should include a PLUGINS.txt file with information about present plugins (internal and external)

+1 
> 4) We should include a LICENCE.txt file with all licence information. 

+ 1
> 
> ... I think that's all :)
> 
> I know... this is very dumb and clearly not mandatory, but it says a lot about the maturity of our Pharo :)
> 
> All agree? Should I create a ticket?

YES!

> 
> Cheers, 
> Esteban
> 
> pd: I'm the only one who does not likes One-Click versions? I would prefer a different package for each platform (Is ugly to have a directory named Pharo.app in linux or windows. Also, no need to have all those duplicated-but-for-different-platform files)

Yes :)