I read my email the wrong way. See the answer of adrian and frankly I imagine somebody at ViewPoints collecting home made liberal licenses..... I **hate** licenses certainly much more than you and I got ***BURNED*** during years because of the license of Squeak I have folder full of crap to get Squeak presentation accepted at Linux days I hate the lawer oriented view they impose on us this is why I took mit and period. Stef On Dec 20, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
now the questions are - is it really that difficult to agree for a project on a given simple license such as MIT? - I also hate licenses since they polute our lives but I just don't care and signed MIT - should we accept this kind of license (of course it is compatible with MIT) but this looks a door open to the mess.
I'm not sure squeakers realized that after all the effort of yohsiki to get SqueakEtoys clean 3.11 could be WTFPL because keith commit on it.
Thats a complete load of rubbish.
No. 1 I dont see any need for profanity.
No. 2 my licence is not like GNU, please dont say it is because you will just confuse people. Its freer than MIT because I don't care if you take my code and sell it as your own. You can even say you wrote it if you like. The responsibility for what you do with it is yours not mine.
Keith
I'm quite convinced that they will boycott such a code.
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project