I meant things like [2] which could be embedded directly. Also, [4] is something that you can link to. The 'Ideas for research' could all be links as well. I cannot find [1] in the text itself. You could also add some (relevant or just nice) pictures.
On 15 Mar 2015, at 17:00, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback! Could you be more specific? For example, I clicked the links and they seem to work...
On Mar 15, 2015, at 5:54 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 [via Smalltalk]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Sean,
The article is very good, but it could use some editing/cleanup. Have a look at what is possible in https://medium.com/concerning-pharo. You should at least make the links work.
Sven
On 15 Mar 2015, at 02:57, Sean P. DeNigris <<a href="x-msg://52/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4811959&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]> wrote:
philippeback wrote
Because Sven articles are there already.
Ah, okay :) I also posted to my blog and shared on reddit http://redd.it/2z2ysg and HN https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9205061
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/OT-Fwd-Why-GSoC-Why-me-tp4811878p4811912.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://forum.world.st/OT-Fwd-Why-GSoC-Why-me-tp4811878p4811959.html To unsubscribe from [OT]: Fwd: Why GSoC? Why me?, click here. NAML
Cheers, Sean
View this message in context: Re: [OT]: Fwd: Why GSoC? Why me? Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.