Sept. 28, 2009
9:28 a.m.
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Michael Rueger <m.rueger@acm.org> wrote:
Michael Rueger wrote:
I'm in favor of pushing the CairoGraphics package and porting Rome to it. Despite (or on top of? ;-) ) my arguments in the previous mail that would be the way to go either way :-)
My argument basically is that we should avoid "trapping" people into the Cairo back-end. It is neither perfect nor the best for every application.
Ok, we have to keep the possibility to change the backend. However, for the Cairo backend, I think we should use a generic Smalltalk binding for Cairo and not create a new one. What do you think?
+1 Michael