On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:35:02AM +0200, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
2017-08-02 9:28 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com>:
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hello, > > we are checking a huge pull request #177 (https://github.com/pharo- project/ > pharo/pull/177) that will change some basics of the bootstrap process: > > ... > > So please, try to look at the PR and test the resultant image [1] to avoid some > major problems. > > [1] https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/7.0/job/70-PR-Check-Load/ lastSuccessfulBuild > /artifact/bootstrap-cache/Pharo7.0-32bit-9c0691d.zip
This image had gone by the time I tried to download it, however the same directory contained Pharo7.0-32bit-58e8755.
There were some fixing commits to the PR so the build hash changed. The original download link should contain build number, not symbolic lastSuccessfulBuild. Sorry for troubles.
Thanks for the clarification. The main point of my message was that I was able to do some successfull testing (as requested), and which version was tested. :-) Cheers, Alistair
I did some ad hoc testing with my current Pharo 7 code and it worked without any problems. (but this is only a small test)
P.S. It would be great if the archive name included something that would allow us to easily guess which is a newer version, e.g.
git rev-list --count HEAD
Thanks, Alistair