Yes lukas prepared the package when we were eating black chocolate like mad :) On May 18, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On May 18, 2010, at 11:24 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On May 18, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Yes, we should probably do that. It requires some work because of changes in 1.1.
The network rollback package is ready to be loaded. We were just waiting to know
Oh, you already did the work!
Then I suggest to load it. The "new" IPv6 code basically is a hack on top of the old implementation. Its prone to fail.
Adrian
Adrian
On May 18, 2010, at 09:24 , Michael Roberts wrote:
I am surprised too. would it not be safer to just apply the same reversion of the code so that 1.1 is the same as 1.0? Then when someone has the time to do a full review, a "new" network can be applied to the start of a dev cycle, with some form of integration tests.
cheers, Mike
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Hi Alex,
One thing that bothers me is the network code. Although nobody reported problems I cannot believe that it suddenly works without that we fixed it. The new implementation that is in 1.1 has been reverted in 1.0 and since then we haven't had any complaints. Now in 1.1 I guess that there are not that many people using it yet.
If there are people at the sprint with different OS and configurations (Linux vs Mac; IPv4 vs. IPv6), you could try to reproduce the problems that were reported earlier (check the issue tracker).
Another valuable help would be to (manually) test the tools, especially the ones loaded into Pharo to make sure we don't have any obvious problems there.
Hope you have a productive weekend!
Cheers, Adrian
On May 18, 2010, at 02:49 , Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Mariano, Stef, Adrian,
I would like to focus the Pharo sprint this week end on helping Pharo 1.1. In addition to reviewing and fixing the issues tagged as 1.1, are there some particular actions you want to see realized this Saturday?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 16 May 2010, at 18:26, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
- Integegrate the remaining fixes and crates a PharoCore-11XXX-alpha1.zip and put it in gforge
I will go over some this week.
Alexandre
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project