[Pharo-project] accessors vs direct access in Cog

Hi guys Ideally I would love to be able to use accessors as the abstraction layer that they can bring us: I mean the fact that we could avoid to have offset based bytecode means that we could reuse a lot more the methods (in special case - mixins and others). Now I have a question does the JIT or the shortcut (not sure if this is in stackVM) blurry the cost of accessors vs. direct accesses? Does anybody run a benchmarck about self x vs x in Cog recently on a real app? Stef