Re: [Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo

Oscar Nierstrasz wrote:

Oops. I made a mistake in the experiment. There is actually less difference than I thought.

Here we load a web site, optionally using split and join to remove all comments. My regex version seems to be only marginally worse than Keith's sequence splitting.

5289 "ON split on regex" 5327

5165 "KH split on sequence" 5160

2153 "no splitting" 2160

So regex splitting seems to be feasible.

splitOn: uses double dispatch so that it is the argument that determines who it performs the splitting. All you have to do it implement Regex-#splitUp: aString Keith