Is there any reason against amending Monticello to store and save all author's names? Presumably, we'd also want a tool that could extract amnders' names all the way back to the first commit of a package? How many on-line Monticello repositories are in common use? (I know of SqueakSource.com, Smalltalkhub.com and SqueakSource3) Are there active administrators for each of those repositories that would allow us to update the repositories to use the updated Monticello? On 22 November 2015 at 15:42, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 20 Nov 2015, at 14:35, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
2015-11-20 14:21 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
epicea data is not stored forever. It is seasion based and the shipped image is clean.
But current source of this info is changes file (maybe sources). And I remember you planned to store current sources in image. And such information can be there too. Maybe I miss something?
The original author is not really that much of information. And storing it for every method in the image would take space.
As I said: the whole idea of using a source revision control system is that you have the *complete* history available, but not wasting RAM.
Marcus